What's So Bad about Blackface?

In Dan Flory & Mary Bloodsworth-Lugo (eds.), Race, Philosophy, and Film. Routledge. pp. 51-68 (2013)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
I argue that what’s so bad (qua film fiction) about the cinematic practice of actor-character race-mismatching—be it the historically infamous and intuitively repugnant practice of blackface or one of its more contemporary kin—is that the extent to which film-fictions employ such practices is typically the extent to which such film-fictions unrealistically depict facts about race. More precisely, I claim that race-mismatching film fictions—understood as a species of unrealistic fiction—are prima facie inconsistent fictions with the capacity to mislead their audiences about certain morally relevant actual-world states-of-affairs and thus, prima facie aesthetically, epistemically, and morally defective.
Keywords
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MAGWSB
Upload history
First archival date: 2013-05-10
Latest version: 2 (2015-05-01)
View other versions
Added to PP index
2013-05-10

Total views
1,564 ( #1,590 of 51,489 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
50 ( #10,990 of 51,489 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.