Ethics and Practical Reason [Book Review]

Philosophical Studies 7:119-120 (1999)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In this review of essays on the topic of practical reason, the neo-Humeanism of philosophers such as James Drier, according to whom reasons are instrumental, is shown to be susceptible to the objections of Kantian philosophers such as Christine Korsgaard: the fact that you desire to X can never entail that you ought to X. Kantianism, however, comes under attack from neo-Aristotelian philosophers such as Berys Gaut, who argues that it is a mistake to identify goodness with being the object of free rational choice.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MAHEAP
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-06-08
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2018-06-08

Total views
41 ( #33,173 of 39,984 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
32 ( #16,446 of 39,984 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.