Episodic Memory: And what is it for?

In Christopher McCarroll, Kourken Michaelian & André Sant'Anna (eds.), Current Controversies in Philosophy of Memory. Routledge (forthcoming)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The question of what the function of human remembering might be has entered the contemporary philosophical discourse only relatively recently. In this debate, two main views have emerged: preservatism and simulationism. According to preservatism, the function of remembering is to preserve information from/about the past. In contrast, simulationism holds that the function of remembering is to enable reliable thought about the future. Here, I employ form to function reasoning to evaluate both of these views. I argue that both perservatism and simulationism fail to account for the entire representational structure of episodic remembering. As an alternative, I then propose my own account: that the function of remembering is to track when we have epistemic authority about the past.
Categories
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MAHEMA-3
Upload history
Archival date: 2021-11-02
View other versions
Added to PP index
2021-11-02

Total views
36 ( #61,318 of 65,693 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
36 ( #23,472 of 65,693 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.