Innocent Burdens

Washington and Lee Law Review 71 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this article Judith Jarvis Thomson's Good Samaritan Argument in defense of abortion in the case of rape is defended from two objections: the Kill vs. Let Die Objection, and the Intend to Kill vs. Merely Foresee Death Objection. The article concludes that these defenses do not defend Thomson from further objections from Peter Singer and David Oderberg.

Author's Profile

James Mahon
Lehman College (CUNY)

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-12-18

Downloads
1,589 (#6,526)

6 months
138 (#27,475)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?