What Can Philosophers Learn from Psychopathy?

European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 14 (1):63-78 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Many spectacular claims about psychopaths are circulated. This contribution aims at providing the reader with the more complex reality of the phenomenon (or phenomena), and to point to issues of particular interest to philosophers working in moral psychology and moral theory. I first discuss the current evidence regarding psychopaths’ deficient empathy and decision-making skills. I then explore what difference it makes to our thinking whether we regard their deficit dimensionally (as involving abilities that are on or off) and whether we focus on primary or secondary psychopathy. My conclusion is that most grand claims about psychopathy settling long-standing debates in moral philosophy and psychology are overblown, but there is much to be learnt from this disorder when it comes to formulating modern theories of moral psychology.

Author's Profile

Heidi L. Maibom
University of Cincinnati

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-11-07

Downloads
614 (#12,830)

6 months
51 (#19,060)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?