Do gestalt effects show that we perceive high-level aesthetic properties?

Analysis 78 (3):440-450 (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Whether we perceive high-level properties is presently a source of controversy. A promising test case for whether we do is aesthetic perception. Aesthetic properties are distinct from low-level properties, like shape and colour. Moreover, some of them, e.g. being serene and being handsome, are properties we appear to perceive. Aesthetic perception also shares a similarity with gestalt effects, e.g. seeing-as, in that aesthetic properties, like gestalt phenomena, appear to ‘emerge’ from low-level properties. Gestalts effects, of course, are widely observed, which raises the question: do gestalt effects make it plausible that we perceive high-level aesthetic properties? Contra Stokes, this paper argues that they don’t. This is interesting in its own right, but it also points to a more general lesson, namely we should resist the temptation to appeal to gestalt effects to argue for high-level perception.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MAJDGE
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-12-21
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Seeing‐As in the Light of Vision Science.Ned Block - 2014 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 89 (1):560-572.
Categories of Art.Walton, Kendall L.

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2017-12-21

Total views
207 ( #13,457 of 38,917 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
62 ( #6,557 of 38,917 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.