Radically non-­ideal climate politics and the obligation to at least vote green

Environmental Values 22 (5):589-608 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Obligations to reduce one’s green house gas emissions appear to be difficult to justify prior to large-scale collective action because an individual’s emissions have virtually no impact on the environmental problem. However, I show that individuals’ emissions choices raise the question of whether or not they can be justified as fair use of what remains of a safe global emissions budget. This is true both before and after major mitigation efforts are in place. Nevertheless, it remains difficult to establish an obligation to reduce personal emissions because it appears unlikely that governments will in fact maintain safe emissions budgets. The result, I claim, is that under current conditions we lack outcome, fairness, promotional, virtue or duty based grounds for seeing personal emissions reductions as morally obligatory.

Author's Profile

Aaron Maltais
Stockholm Environment Institute

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-04-12

Downloads
1,392 (#3,993)

6 months
59 (#15,285)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?