Radically non-­ideal climate politics and the obligation to at least vote green

Environmental Values 22 (5):589-608 (2013)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Obligations to reduce one’s green house gas emissions appear to be difficult to justify prior to large-scale collective action because an individual’s emissions have virtually no impact on the environmental problem. However, I show that individuals’ emissions choices raise the question of whether or not they can be justified as fair use of what remains of a safe global emissions budget. This is true both before and after major mitigation efforts are in place. Nevertheless, it remains difficult to establish an obligation to reduce personal emissions because it appears unlikely that governments will in fact maintain safe emissions budgets. The result, I claim, is that under current conditions we lack outcome, fairness, promotional, virtue or duty based grounds for seeing personal emissions reductions as morally obligatory.
Reprint years
2013
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MALRNC
Revision history
First archival date: 2012-04-12
Latest version: 4 (2015-09-20)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Non-Ideal Climate Justice.Eric Brandstedt - 2019 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 22 (2):221-234.
Against Denialism.Broome, John
Causing Global Warming.Gunnemyr, Mattias

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index
2012-04-12

Total views
961 ( #1,940 of 40,150 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
73 ( #6,462 of 40,150 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.