Abstract

Title: Should Human Life Continue if Survival Fully Depends on Money? In the modern world, human survival has become increasingly tied to money. Access to food, clean water, shelter, healthcare, education, and even basic dignity is conditioned by one’s ability to pay. This raises a profound and urgent question: Should human life continue if survival fully depends on money? At the heart of this question lies a deeper inquiry into the moral, philosophical, and systemic foundations of human society. If money becomes the ultimate determinant of life and death, then humanity has strayed far from the natural laws that govern balance, justice, and sustainability. Human life is not a commodity. It is not a transaction, nor a contract signed under the conditions of wealth and possession. It is a natural existence born into the universe, governed by universal laws such as the law of cause and effect, the law of balance, and the law of system integrity. If a system makes human survival conditional on financial means, then that system is defective—it violates the law of balance in nature and leads to systemic suffering, inequality, and eventual collapse. Money is a human invention. It was created as a tool to facilitate exchange, not as a measure of a person’s worth or a gatekeeper to existence. Over time, however, the monetary system has grown to dominate all aspects of life. In many parts of the world, without money, a person cannot eat, find shelter, or receive medical care. In such a system, those who are poor are not only disadvantaged—they are deprived of their right to live. This is not a natural consequence, but a man-made design, maintained by collective human decisions that have strayed from the universal law of balance. If we accept the premise that human life must earn the right to survive through money, then we also accept that billions of lives are disposable. This leads to a global society built on competition, fear, exploitation, and injustice. The natural law of balance is broken, and so is the moral integrity of that society. How Do We Fix This Issue? The solution begins with recognizing that the current system must be restructured according to the universal laws of nature—especially the law of balance, which dictates that every system, whether personal, social, or ecological, must maintain harmony to survive. 1. Holistic Educational Reform: The root of human decision-making lies in education. A new educational system must be implemented—one that goes beyond technical knowledge and instead teaches the natural laws that govern life. These include the universal law of balance, the law of cause and effect, and the principle that all systems must be free of defects to function properly. Students from all backgrounds and levels must be taught how imbalance in decision-making leads to suffering, injustice, and systemic collapse. This educational reform must be holistic, meaning it shapes the mind, the values, and the worldview of individuals to align with natural law. 2. Redefining the Role of Money: We must shift the role of money from being the condition for survival to being a tool for coordinated development. This means creating systems where basic needs—food, shelter, education, and healthcare—are guaranteed not by one’s financial power, but by one’s existence as a human being. Local and national governments must redirect resources toward ensuring these basic rights through sustainable, community-based systems. Economic models like universal basic services or resource-based economies can be explored as practical steps in this direction. 3. Empowering Leadership with Natural Law: Leaders must be trained—not just in governance or economics—but in the natural science of decision-making based on the universal formula of balance. Policies must be evaluated not only by profit or popularity, but by how they affect the balance of nature, society, and the individual mind. Political decisions must be aligned with the feedback systems between human needs and environmental sustainability. If leadership fails to operate within the framework of natural law, imbalance will persist and human suffering will continue. 4. Global Collaboration for Equity: Addressing this issue is not the job of one country alone. It must be a coordinated global effort to create structures where no human is denied life because of poverty. Institutions like the United Nations, the World Economic Forum, and educational ministries around the world must adopt the understanding that human life has intrinsic value that cannot be priced. International programs must be developed to promote equity, particularly in regions most affected by extreme poverty and systemic inequality. 5. Replacing Dogma with Rational Understanding: Many societal systems, including economic and religious institutions, are guided by dogma—rigid beliefs that resist adaptation. These must be replaced, not with atheism or ideology, but with rational understanding rooted in the universal laws of nature. The goal is not to eliminate belief systems, but to integrate them with reason and balance. This allows humanity to unite under shared principles that respect both individual freedom and collective responsibility. Conclusion Human life must continue—but not under a system where survival is held hostage by money. A society built solely on financial power is fundamentally unjust, unstable, and unsustainable. The solution lies in restructuring human systems—especially education, governance, and economics—based on the universal laws of balance, cause and effect, and system integrity. When decisions are made according to these natural laws, money becomes a tool, not a tyrant. And when life is honored not for its financial utility, but for its natural dignity, humanity will finally move toward justice, harmony, and lasting peace.