Abstract

Violence in Sports and Public Life: A Discourse on the Universal Law of Balance By Angelito Malicse The human experience, whether in the structured environment of sports or the open arena of society, is governed by universal natural laws. Among these, the law of balance holds a central place. It dictates not only the harmony of ecosystems and physical systems but also the inner workings of human thought, emotion, and decision-making. When we compare how violence is treated in sports versus public life, we are not merely observing a cultural or legal distinction—we are witnessing two very different systemic approaches to managing imbalance. In many competitive sports, particularly those involving physical contact like boxing, hockey, or mixed martial arts, certain degrees of aggression and conflict are built into the structure of the game. These activities are bound by rules, referees, safety equipment, and mutual consent. While the public may witness moments of violence—such as a fight on the ice or a punch in the ring—these actions occur within a controlled system. There is a start and an end, boundaries are clear, and consequences are predictable. This kind of conflict, while seemingly chaotic, actually operates within a feedback loop that functions to restore balance—either emotionally, competitively, or interpersonally among players (Coakley, 2009). Here, the law of balance Is honored. Participants and spectators alike recognize that these moments of conflict are not personal but part of the system’s self-correction mechanism. They are expressions of tension release, accountability, or retaliation within limits. Importantly, these systems also include educational components: athletes are trained to control their behavior, accept penalties, and operate within the boundaries of fair play (Shogan, 1999). In this sense, sports act as a microcosm of a balanced society—where temporary imbalance is allowed only to maintain long-term equilibrium. In stark contrast, acts of violence in public life are treated with seriousness and condemnation. Public violence is not bound by a consensual framework; it is unregulated, unanticipated, and often rooted in emotional instability, misinformation, injustice, or oppression. When one individual harms another in public, the action disrupts not just personal safety but the perceived stability of the collective environment. There are no referees, no agreed-upon rules, and no structural mechanism immediately available to restore balance. In such cases, the law of balance is violated, and the system falls into disorder (Rawls, 1971). This is where the importance of police forces and intervention by responsible individuals or institutions becomes vital. The police serve as society’s designated referees in the public arena. They exist to neutralize immediate threats, restore order, and provide a stabilizing feedback mechanism when balance is lost. Their role, when exercised lawfully and ethically, aligns with the natural law of balance: to prevent further escalation, protect innocent lives, and return the environment to a state of peace and security (Goldstein, 1990). Yet intervention alone is not enough. To complete the cycle of restoring balance, society depends on the justice system—a formal structure that examines, judges, and corrects the violations of law and public order. The justice system plays an essential role in ensuring that violent actions are not left unchecked or unresolved. When it functions properly, it acts as a rational and fair feedback mechanism, offering proportionate consequences and opportunities for reform (Becker, 1968; Tyler, 2006). It provides victims with a sense of protection and resolution, and it holds perpetrators accountable in a way that aims not for revenge, but for correction and reintegration into the societal system. A well-functioning justice system honors the universal law of balance by recognizing the interconnectedness of cause and effect. It does not respond with disproportionate punishment or allow impunity; instead, it seeks to restore harmony—not just between individuals, but within the collective consciousness of society. When the justice system fails, either through corruption, delay, or bias, the feedback loop breaks, and public confidence in societal balance erodes. This often leads to further unrest, vigilante justice, or systemic breakdown (Packer, 1968). From the perspective of natural law, particularly my universal formula on the problem of free will, this distinction becomes crucial. Human behavior, whether on the playing field or in daily life, is subject to natural feedback. A person who violates balance—whether through unregulated violence or willful ignorance—disturbs both their internal system (mind, emotion, reason) and the external system (family, society, nation, nature). The result is not only personal suffering but systemic dysfunction. This underscores the need for a holistic educational system—one that does not merely teach skills or memorized facts, but one that programs the individual mind to recognize and operate within the universal law of balance. When individuals are raised with an understanding of how imbalance affects not just themselves but the interconnected systems around them, they develop the inner regulators necessary to live peacefully and responsibly (Noddings, 2013; Freire, 1970). Such an educational system would mirror the structure of organized sports. It would involve feedback mechanisms, critical thinking, emotional self-regulation, and an internal sense of fairness. In this system, violence—whether verbal, emotional, or physical—is never glorified but understood as a sign of imbalance, an alarm that calls for restoration, not retaliation. Leadership plays a vital role here. Leaders, like referees in a game, must understand the natural law of balance and guide their communities accordingly. They must know when to allow constructive conflict and when to intervene. More importantly, they must support both justice and educational reforms that embed the law of balance into the foundation of human development. The end goal Is not the elimination of conflict, but its proper regulation and transformation. Only through this lens—where balance is the ultimate law, and all behavior is subject to feedback—can human society evolve beyond cycles of violence, whether on the field, in public spaces, or within institutions. This is the path to lasting harmony, both within and beyond the boundaries of organized sport. References Becker, G. S. (1968). Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach. Journal of Political Economy. Coakley, J. (2009). Sports in Society: Issues and Controversies. McGraw-Hill. Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. Herder and Herder. Goldstein, H. (1990). Problem-Oriented Policing. McGraw-Hill. Noddings, N. (2013). Education and Democracy in the 21st Century. Teachers College Press. Packer, H. L. (1968). The Limits of the Criminal Sanction. Stanford University Press. Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Harvard University Press. Shogan, D. (1999). The Making of High-Performance Athletes: Discipline, Diversity, and Ethics. University of Toronto Press. Tyler, T. R. (2006). Why People Obey the Law. Princeton University Press.