Agentive Modals

Philosophical Review 126 (3):301-343 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
This essay proposes a new theory of agentive modals: ability modals and their duals, compulsion modals. After criticizing existing approaches—the existential quantificational analysis, the universal quantificational analysis, and the conditional analysis—it presents a new account that builds on both the existential and conditional analyses. On this account, the act conditional analysis, a sentence like ‘John can swim across the river’ says that there is some practically available action that is such that if John tries to do it, he swims across the river. The essay argues that the act conditional analysis avoids the problems faced by existing accounts of agentive modality and shows how the act conditional analysis can be extended to an account of generic agentive modal claims. The upshot is a new vantage point on the role of agentive modal ascriptions in practical discourse: ability ascriptions serve as a kind of hypothetical guarantee, and compulsion ascriptions as a kind of nonhypothetical guarantee.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MANAM
Revision history
Archival date: 2016-10-20
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Bounded Modality.Matthew Mandelkern - 2019 - Philosophical Review 128 (1):1-61.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2016-10-20

Total downloads
212 ( #12,191 of 37,117 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
13 ( #22,751 of 37,117 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.