How to do things with modals

Mind and Language (forthcoming)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
In a brief discussion of epistemic modals, Wittgenstein (1953) warns against ‘regard[ing] a hesitant assertion as an assertion of hesitancy’. A modal claim like ‘It might be raining’, the thought goes, should not be regarded as an assertion of the speaker's uncertainty as to whether or not it is raining, but rather as something quite different in kind: a proposal to treat the possibility of rain as live. Wittgenstein’s admonition has, in recent years, been at the heart of arguments that, in order to make sense of the dynamics of epistemic modal claims, we must reject the contextualist framework for analyzing communication—a framework on which assertions of epistemic modal claims, like all assertions, convey information. In this paper, I argue that, on the contrary, taking Wittgenstein's admonition seriously does not require abandoning the contextualist framework: we can capture the fundamental dynamics of epistemic modality within the contextualist framework, provided we take the assertoric content of unembedded epistemic modal claims to be determined by the prospective common attitudes of the conversants in question.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
First archival date: 2018-11-06
Latest version: 2 (2018-11-26)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Bounded Modality.Matthew Mandelkern - 2019 - Philosophical Review 128 (1):1-61.
What ‘Must’ Adds.Matthew Mandelkern - 2019 - Linguistics and Philosophy 42 (3):225-266.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
63 ( #29,113 of 39,914 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
40 ( #12,848 of 39,914 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.