Brandom's Inferentialist Theory and the Meaning Entitlement Connection

In Hamdi Mlika (ed.), Lectures de Robert Brandom. Edilivre. pp. 51-90 (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
According to Brandom’s conceptual role semantics, to grasp a concept involves a commitment to drawing certain inferences. This is a consequence of the inferentialist thesis that the meaning of a term is given by its justification through assertibility conditions. Inferential commitments come out from a material notion of inference which underwrites human rational discourse and activity. In this paper I discuss a problem of Brandom’s semantics allegedly exposed in an argument by Paul Boghossian against Dummett’s and Brandom’s substantive conception of meaning. I contend that Boghossian’s analysis is dubious because it overlooks an important difference between Dummett’s and Brandom’s positions related respectively to a monotonic and a non-monotonic view of the norm underwriting meaning.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MARBIT-2
Revision history
First archival date: 2016-06-10
Latest version: 7 (2018-10-07)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2016-06-10

Total views
416 ( #6,131 of 39,000 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
83 ( #4,654 of 39,000 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.