Eukaryotes first: how could that be? [Book Review]

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 370:1-10 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In the half century since the formulation of the prokaryote : eukaryote dichotomy, many authors have proposed that the former evolved from something resembling the latter, in defiance of common (and possibly common sense) views. In such ‘eukaryotes first’ (EF) scenarios, the last universal common ancestor is imagined to have possessed significantly many of the complex characteristics of contemporary eukaryotes, as relics of an earlier ‘progenotic’ period or RNAworld. Bacteria and Archaea thus must have lost these complex features secondarily, through ‘streamlining’. If the canonical three-domain tree in which Archaea and Eukarya are sisters is accepted, EF entails that Bacteria and Archaea are convergently prokaryotic.We ask what this means and how it might be tested.

Author Profiles

Carlos Mariscal de Gante
National Autonomous University of Mexico (PhD)
Carlos Mariscal
University of Nevada, Reno
W. Ford Doolittle
Dalhousie University

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-03-15

Downloads
369 (#63,312)

6 months
138 (#30,300)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?