Empirical thought experiments: A trascendental-operational view

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The operational perspective here defended permits a reflexive-transcendental point of view that sharply distinguishes the two concepts, while, at the same time, maintaining the connection between them. On the one hand, simply imagining that the experimental apparatus, counterfactually anticipated in a thought experiment, has really been constructed is sufficient to erase any difference between thought and real experiments. On the other hand, this very ‘imagining’, this capacity of the mind to assume every real entity as a possible entity, underpins the difference in principle – a properly transcendental difference – between thought and real experiments. This difference, however, implies the intimate association between experiment and thought experiment: All thought experiments must be thought of as translatable into real ones, and all real experiments as realisations of thought ones. What thought experiments have over and above real experiments is the mere fact that they exist in a purely hypothetical sphere; what real have over and above thought experiments is the mere fact that they overstep the sphere of the possible, in the experiment’s real execution.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories
(categorize this paper)
Reprint years
2009, 2010
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MARETE
Revision history
Archival date: 2016-03-04
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Galilean Idealization.McMullin, Ernan

View all 29 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2009-06-12

Total views
92 ( #25,776 of 40,772 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #36,413 of 40,772 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.