Occam’s Razor and Non-Voluntarist Accounts of Political Authority

Dialogue 56 (1):159-173 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Certain non-voluntarists have recently defended political authority by advancing two-part views. First, they argue that the state, or the law, is best (or uniquely) capable of accomplishing something important. Second, they defend a substantive normative principle on which being so situated is sufficient for de jure authority. This paper uses widely accepted tenets to show that all such defenses of authority fail.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MARORA-4
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-03-09
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

View all 24 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2017-03-26

Total views
37 ( #36,345 of 42,148 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
12 ( #34,797 of 42,148 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.