Surface composition as bridging

Journal of Semantics 18 (2):127-177 (2001)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
The development of explicit theories of dynamic context change has led to a fundamentally new perspective on the interpretation of discourse. In this paper I show that this development also opens up the possibility of approaching subclausal composition along similar lines. More specifically, I argue that a dynamic theory where type-driven rules apply directly to overt surface structures and fill in missing information by building anaphoric bridges is more faithful to natural language semantics than the classical Montagovian approach.
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-10-02
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Conditional Questions.Isaacs, J. & Rawlins, K.
A Formal Semantic Analysis of Gesture.Lascarides, A. & Stone, M.

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
167 ( #22,452 of 46,314 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
30 ( #26,243 of 46,314 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.