Seeking desire: Reflections on Blackburn's lust

Social Philosophy Today 22:219-230 (2006)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
This paper is a critical discussion of Simon Blackburn’s recent work on lust. Blackburn develops a view on which lust is decent only when part of a pure mutuality in sex, and is best left alone—we ought not tamper with its “freedom of flow.” I argue that this treatment, which I believe reflects commonly held views, fails in several ways. First, it does not square with the fact that we pursue lust as a good in itself. Second, pure mutuality is hard to come by and almost impossible to recognize, so Blackburn’s account is more restrictive than it may seem. Third, on such a view, masturbation is morally sanctioned only insofar as it mimics real sex; this doesn’t seem right. Finally, such a perspective fits ill with some recent research on the biology of lust in women
Keywords
Reprint years
2007
ISBN(s)
1543-4044
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MARSDR
Upload history
First archival date: 2011-02-22
Latest version: 1 (2012-10-06)
View other versions
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
606 ( #8,949 of 2,439,319 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
22 ( #30,927 of 2,439,319 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.