What is the Epistemic Significance of Disagreement?

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Over the past decade, attention to epistemically significant disagreement has centered on the question of whose disagreement qualifies as significant, but ignored another fundamental question: what is the epistemic significance of disagreement? While epistemologists have assumed that disagreement is only significant when it indicates a determinate likelihood that one’s own belief is false, and therefore that only disagreements with epistemic peers are significant at all, they have ignored a more subtle and more basic significance that belongs to all disagreements, regardless of who they are with—that the opposing party is wrong. It is important to recognize the basic significance of disagreement since it is what explains all manners of rational responses to disagreement, including assessing possible epistemic peers and arguing against opponents regardless of their epistemic fitness.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
2069-0533
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MARWIT-24
Revision history
Archival date: 2019-10-07
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2019-10-07

Total views
62 ( #37,641 of 47,301 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
62 ( #11,726 of 47,301 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.