On the Possibility of Hallucinations

Mind:fzy088 (forthcoming)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Many take the possibility of hallucinations to imply that a relationalist account, according to which perceptual experiences are constituted by direct relations to ordinary mind-independent objects, is false. The common reaction among relationalists is to adopt a disjunctivist view that denies that hallucinations have the same nature as perceptual experiences. This paper proposes a non-disjunctivist response to the argument from hallucination by arguing that the alleged empirical and a priori evidence in support of the possibility of hallucinations is inconclusive. A corollary upshot of the article is that whether hallucinations are possible or not is still an open empirical question.
No keywords specified (fix it)
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2019-01-09
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
The Transparency of Experience.Martin, Michael G. F.
Mind and World.Price, Huw & McDowell, John
Knowledge and its Limits.Williamson, Timothy
The Limits of Self-Awareness.Martin, Michael G. F.

View all 53 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
119 ( #22,407 of 40,675 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
64 ( #8,305 of 40,675 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.