Suffering Pains

In The Philosophy of Suffering: Metaphysics, Value, and Normativity. London: Routledge (forthcoming)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The paper aims at clarifying the distinctions and relations between pain and suffering. Three negative theses are defended: 1. Pain and suffering are not identical. 2. Painisnotaspeciesofsuffering,norissufferingaspeciesof pain, nor are pain and suffering of a common (proximate) genus. 3. Suffering cannot be defined as the perception of a pain’s badness, nor can pain be defined as a suffered bodily sensation. Three positive theses are endorsed: 4. Pain and suffering are categorically distinct: pain is a localised bodily episode, suffering is a non-localised affective attitude. 5. Sufferingcanbeexpressed,painscannot.Asaconsequence,we can have compassion for the suffering of others, not for their pains. 6. Therelationbetweenpainandsufferingisakintotherelation between danger and fear, injustice and indignation, wrongdoing and guilt: suffering is the correct reaction to pain. One upshot is that both the influential view that the experience of pain is incorrigible and the influential view that the ordinary conception of pain is paradoxical are false.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MASSP
Revision history
Archival date: 2019-01-08
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2019-01-08

Total downloads
21 ( #33,142 of 36,533 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
21 ( #15,812 of 36,533 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.