Falsification of theories without verification of basic statements – an argument for the possibility of knowledge growth

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Karl Popper rightly contests the possibility of a verification of basic statements. At the same time he strictly believes in the possibility of growth of empirical knowledge. Knowledge growth, however, is only possible if empirical theories can be falsified. This raises the question, how theories can be falsified, if a verification of those statements that falsify theories – i.e. basic statements – is not possible. This problem is often referred to as the “basic problem” or “problem of the empirical basis”. In this paper I show that – from a logical point of view – a falsification of theories is possible without a verification of basic state-ments. Furthermore I show that knowledge growth in the empirical sciences will be possible if two assumptions are valid. These assumptions can neither be proven nor falsified. However, they have to be postulated by everybody in eve-ryday life.
Reprint years
2004
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MAUFOT
Upload history
Archival date: 2013-09-27
View other versions
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
155 ( #26,528 of 51,727 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #46,864 of 51,727 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.