Can there be necessary connections between successive events?

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
THE aim of this paper is to refute Hume's contention that there cannot be logically necessary connections between successive events. I intend to establish, in other words, not 'Logically necessary connections do exist between successive events', but instead the rather more modest proposition: 'It may be, it is possible, as far as we can ever know for certain, that logically necessary connections do exist between successive events.' Towards the end of the paper I shall say something about the implications of rejecting Hume's contention.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories
Reprint years
1969
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MAXCTB
Revision history
Archival date: 2011-03-12
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
The Need for a Revolution in the Philosophy of Science.Nicholas Maxwell - 2002 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 33 (2):381-408.
Does Probabilism Solve the Great Quantum Mystery?Nicholas Maxwell - 2004 - Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 19 (3):321-336.

View all 23 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
708 ( #4,991 of 50,121 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
68 ( #8,049 of 50,121 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.