What’s Wrong With Aim-Oriented Empiricism?

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
For four decades it has been argued that we need to adopt a new conception of science called aim-oriented empiricism. This has far-reaching implications and repercussions for science, the philosophy of science, academic inquiry in general, conception of rationality, and how we go about attempting to make progress towards as good a world as possible. Despite these far-reaching repercussions, aim-oriented empiricism has so far received scant attention from philosophers of science. Here, sixteen objections to the validity of the argument for aim-oriented empiricism are subjected to critical scrutiny.
Reprint years
2015
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MAXWWW-3
Revision history
First archival date: 2012-04-11
Latest version: 2 (2015-12-17)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2012-04-11

Total views
360 ( #6,968 of 37,951 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
12 ( #24,939 of 37,951 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.