Linguistic intuition and calibration

Linguistics and Philosophy 35 (5):443-460 (2012)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Linguists, particularly in the generative tradition, commonly rely upon intuitions about sentences as a key source of evidence for their theories. While widespread, this methodology has also been controversial. In this paper, I develop a positive account of linguistic intuition, and defend its role in linguistic inquiry. Intuitions qualify as evidence as form of linguistic behavior, which, since it is partially caused by linguistic competence (the object of investigation), can be used to study this competence. I defend this view by meeting two challenges. First, that intuitions are collected through methodologically unsound practices, and second, that intuition cannot distinguish between the contributions of competence and performance systems.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MAYLIA
Revision history
Archival date: 2013-01-18
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Aspects of the Theory of Syntax.Ferebee, Ann S. & Chomsky, Noam

View all 19 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Linguistic Intuitions.Maynes, Jeffrey & Gross, Steven
Linguistic Intuitions.Jeffrey Maynes, Steven Gross

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2012-12-05

Total views
980 ( #2,572 of 45,585 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
65 ( #11,060 of 45,585 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.