Moral Judgment and Deontology: Empirical Developments

Philosophy Compass 9 (11):745-755 (2014)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
A traditional idea is that moral judgment involves more than calculating the consequences of actions; it also requires an assessment of the agent's intentions, the act's nature, and whether the agent uses another person as a means to her ends. I survey experimental developments suggesting that ordinary people often tacitly reason in terms of such deontological rules. It's now unclear whether we should posit a traditional form of the doctrine of double effect. However, further research suggests that a range of non-consequentialist factors influence moral judgment, including intentions, commissions, personal harm, and agent-centered commitments. Many, if not all, such factors appear to affect how involved the agent is in bringing about an outcome.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
First archival date: 2014-07-02
Latest version: 5 (2016-01-29)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

View all 59 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Moral Reasoning and Emotion.May, Joshua & Kumar, Victor

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
533 ( #6,567 of 46,365 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
63 ( #12,132 of 46,365 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.