Practical Interests, Relevant Alternatives, and Knowledge Attributions: An Empirical Study

Review of Philosophy and Psychology 1 (2):265–273 (2010)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In defending his interest-relative account of knowledge in Knowledge and Practical Interests (2005), Jason Stanley relies heavily on intuitions about several bank cases. We experimentally test the empirical claims that Stanley seems to make concerning our common-sense intuitions about these bank cases. Additionally, we test the empirical claims that Jonathan Schaffer seems to make in his critique of Stanley. We argue that our data impugn what both Stanley and Schaffer claim our intuitions about such cases are. To account for these results, one must develop a better conception of the connection between a subject's interests and her body of knowledge than those offered by Stanley and Schaffer.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MAYPIR
Revision history
First archival date: 2013-04-01
Latest version: 2 (2013-04-01)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Evidence, Pragmatics, and Justification.Fantl, Jeremy & McGrath, Matthew
Do You Know More When It Matters Less?Feltz, Adam & Zarpentine, Chris

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Contrastive Knowledge Surveyed.Schaffer, Jonathan & Knobe, Joshua
Knowledge, Stakes, and Mistakes.Buckwalter, Wesley & Schaffer, Jonathan
Do You Know More When It Matters Less?Feltz, Adam & Zarpentine, Chris
Empirical tests of interest-relative invariantism.Sripada, Chandra Sekhar & Stanley, Jason

View all 39 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index
2009-02-05

Total downloads
395 ( #5,939 of 37,113 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
18 ( #18,315 of 37,113 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.