Can Typicality Arguments Dissolve Cosmology’s Flatness Problem?

Philosophy of Science 84 (5):1239-1252 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Several physicists, among them Hawking, Page, Coule, and Carroll, have argued against the probabilistic intuitions underlying fine-tuning arguments in cosmology and instead propose that the canonical measure on the phase space of Friedman-Robertson-Walker space-times should be used to evaluate fine-tuning. They claim that flat space-times in this set are actually typical on this natural measure and that therefore the flatness problem is illusory. I argue that they misinterpret typicality in this phase space and, moreover, that no conclusion can be drawn at all about the flatness problem by using the canonical measure alone.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories
(categorize this paper)
Reprint years
2017
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MCCCTA-5
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-12-16
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
.Frigg, Roman & Nguyen, James

View all 9 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2017-12-15

Total views
29 ( #37,911 of 42,120 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #40,715 of 42,120 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.