On the Conspicuous Absence of Private Defense

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
This essay offers a standard by which to assess the feasibility of market anarchism. In anarchist thought, the concept of feasibility concerns both the ability and the willingness of private defense agencies to liberate their clients from state oppression. I argue that the emergence of a single stateless pocket of effective, privately-provided defense for a “reasonable” length of time is sufficient to affirm feasibility. I then consider the failure of private defense agencies to achieve even this standard. Furthermore, I identify five possible explanations for the conspicuous absence of private defense agencies. These explanations are entrepreneurial, technological, or economic in nature, or result from a lack of consumer demand or a lack of incentive for violence specialists to refrain from aggression. Of these, only an economic deficiency renders anarchism intrinsically unworkable.
Categories
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MCCOTC-2
Revision history
Archival date: 2016-12-06
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2016-08-12

Total views
51 ( #35,809 of 43,872 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #42,286 of 43,872 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.