Random and Systematic Error in the Puzzle of the Unmarked Clock

Abstract

A puzzle of an unmarked clock, used by Timothy Williamson to question the KK principle, was separately adapted by David Christensen and Adam Elga to critique a principle of Rational Reflection. Both authors, we argue, flout the received relationship between ideal agency and the classical distinction between systematic and random error, namely that ideal agents are subject only to the latter. As a result, these criticisms miss their mark.

Author's Profile

Randall G. McCutcheon
University of Memphis

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-11-30

Downloads
127 (#52,845)

6 months
20 (#50,812)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?