Reviving material theories of induction

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 83:1–7 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

John Norton says that philosophers have been led astray for thousands of years by their attempt to treat induction formally. He is correct that such an attempt has caused no end of trouble, but he is wrong about the history. There is a rich tradition of non-formal induction. In fact, material theories of induction prevailed all through antiquity and from the Renaissance to the mid-1800s. Recovering these past systems would not only fill lacunae in Norton’s own theory but would highlight areas where Norton has not freed himself from the straightjacket of formal induction as much as he might think. This essay begins that recovery.

Author's Profile

John P. McCaskey
Fordham University

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-07-09

Downloads
557 (#40,692)

6 months
113 (#45,090)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?