Laura J. Snyder, Reforming Philosophy: A Victorian Debate on Science and Society [Book Review]

The Objective Standard 2008:107–109 (2008)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The 19th-century philosopher John Stuart Mill is widely regarded as one of history’s leading proponents of inductive science and of political liberty. Yet, oddly, philosophers working in his train have been remarkably unsuccessful in saying exactly what is wrong with the scientific skepticism or the political tyrannies of the past one hundred and fifty years. Is it possible that Mr. Mill was not such a good guy after all? … I recommend the book to anyone interested in a scholarly treatment of Victorian England, of 19th-century science, of the history of scientific method, of the philosophy of induction, or of the underappreciated historian and philosopher William Whewell. For anyone who thinks John Stuart Mill was a champion of commonsense realism, inductive science, or individual liberty, the book is a must-read.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MCCROL-3
Upload history
Archival date: 2020-07-10
View other versions
Added to PP index
2020-07-10

Total views
16 ( #59,866 of 2,433,423 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #52,802 of 2,433,423 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.