Minimalism and Expressivism

Ethics in Progress 3:9-30 (2012)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
There has been a great deal of discussion in the recent philosophical literature of the relationship between the minimalist theory of truth and the expressivist metaethical theory. One group of philosophers contends that minimalism and expressivism are compatible, the other group contends that such theories are incompatible. Following Simon Blackburn (manuscript), I will call the former position ‘compatibilism’ and the latter position ‘incompatiblism.’ Even those compatibilist philosophers who hold that there is no conflict or tension between these two theories—minimalism and expressivism—typically think that some revision of minimalism is required to accommodate expressivism. The claim that there is such an incompatibility, I will argue, is based on a misunderstanding of the historical roots of expressivism, the motivations behind the expressivist theory, and the essential commitments of expressivism. I will present an account of the expressivist theory that is clearly consistent with minimalism.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2016-01-29
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
A Treatise of Human Nature.Hume, David & Lindsay, A. D.
The Nature of Morality.Phillips, D. Z. & Harman, Gilbert

View all 13 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
261 ( #15,916 of 47,115 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
75 ( #8,928 of 47,115 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.