Transitivity and Proportionality in Causation

Synthese 195 (3):1211-1229 (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
It is commonly assumed that causation is transitive and in this paper I aim to reconcile this widely-held assumption with apparent evidence to the contrary. I will discuss a familiar approach to certain well-known counterexamples, before introducing a more resistant sort of case of my own. I will then offer a novel solution, based on Yablo’s proportionality principle, that succeeds in even these more resistant cases. There is a catch, however. Either proportionality is a constraint on which causal claims are true, and the solution works, or it is not and causation is not transitive after all. I will argue that the first horn has unacceptable consequences and should be rejected, but that the second horn is less costly than it might initially appear.
Reprint years
2018
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MCDTAP-2
Upload history
First archival date: 2015-04-07
Latest version: 3 (2016-11-02)
View other versions
Added to PP index
2015-04-07

Total views
557 ( #9,420 of 2,425,830 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
45 ( #17,512 of 2,425,830 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.