Transitivity and Proportionality in Causation

Synthese 195 (3):1211-1229 (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
It is commonly assumed that causation is transitive and in this paper I aim to reconcile this widely-held assumption with apparent evidence to the contrary. I will discuss a familiar approach to certain well-known counterexamples, before introducing a more resistant sort of case of my own. I will then offer a novel solution, based on Yablo’s proportionality principle, that succeeds in even these more resistant cases. There is a catch, however. Either proportionality is a constraint on which causal claims are true, and the solution works, or it is not and causation is not transitive after all. I will argue that the first horn has unacceptable consequences and should be rejected, but that the second horn is less costly than it might initially appear.
Reprint years
2018
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MCDTAP-2
Revision history
First archival date: 2015-04-07
Latest version: 3 (2016-11-02)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2015-04-07

Total downloads
287 ( #8,891 of 37,122 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
40 ( #8,833 of 37,122 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.