Objectivism and Perspectivism about the Epistemic Ought

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
What ought you believe? According to a traditional view, it depends on your evidence: you ought to believe (only) what your evidence supports. Recently, however, some have claimed that what you ought to believe depends not on your evidence but simply on what is true: you ought to believe (only) the truth. In this paper, we present and defend two arguments against this latter view. We also explore some of the parallels between this debate in epistemology, and the debate in ethics about whether how you ought to act depends on your epistemic position, or on all the facts.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
First archival date: 2017-01-19
Latest version: 2 (2019-05-13)
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
484 ( #13,879 of 65,695 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
29 ( #27,861 of 65,695 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.