A moral basis for prohibiting performance enhancing drug use in competitive sport

Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 44 (2):243-257 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
A strong moral reason for prohibiting doping in sport is to be found in the bad choices that would be faced by clean athletes in a sporting world that tolerated doping. The case against doping is not, however, to be grounded in the concept of coercion. Instead, it is grounded in a general duty of sport to afford fair opportunity to the goods that are distinctively within sport's sphere of control. The moral reason to prohibit doping need not be balanced against any autonomy claim of athletes who would prefer to dope because, upon closer examination, such claims have no force. The moral reason to prohibit doping does, however, need to be balanced against the enforcement costs imposed on all athletes by effective prohibition.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories
(categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MCKAMB
Revision history
First archival date: 2017-10-03
Latest version: 2 (2017-10-03)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Coercion.Nozick, Robert

View all 11 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2017-04-24

Total views
177 ( #23,650 of 50,147 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
31 ( #20,336 of 50,147 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.