A moral basis for prohibiting performance enhancing drug use in competitive sport

Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 44 (2):243-257 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
A strong moral reason for prohibiting doping in sport is to be found in the bad choices that would be faced by clean athletes in a sporting world that tolerated doping. The case against doping is not, however, to be grounded in the concept of coercion. Instead, it is grounded in a general duty of sport to afford fair opportunity to the goods that are distinctively within sport's sphere of control. The moral reason to prohibit doping need not be balanced against any autonomy claim of athletes who would prefer to dope because, upon closer examination, such claims have no force. The moral reason to prohibit doping does, however, need to be balanced against the enforcement costs imposed on all athletes by effective prohibition.
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
First archival date: 2017-10-03
Latest version: 2 (2017-10-03)
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
264 ( #24,136 of 2,448,687 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
37 ( #17,656 of 2,448,687 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.