Epistemic Contextualism: A Normative Approach

Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 94 (1):101-123 (2013)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In his Knowledge and Practical Interests Jason Stanley argues that the view he defends, which he calls interest-relative invariantism, is better supported by certain cases than epistemic contextualism. In this article I argue that a version of epistemic contextualism that emphasizes the role played by the ascriber's practical interests in determining the truth-conditions of her ‘knowledge’ ascriptions – a view that I call interests contextualism – is better supported by Stanley's cases than interest-relative invariantism or other versions of epistemic contextualism. My main aim is to show that interests contextualism is a viable, if often over-looked, alternative to the usual positions in the contemporary debate
Categories
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MCKECA
Revision history
Archival date: 2012-12-11
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Elusive Knowledge.Lewis, David

View all 19 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Stabilizing Knowledge.Hannon, Michael

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2012-10-20

Total views
383 ( #6,467 of 38,049 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
28 ( #13,602 of 38,049 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.