Normative scorekeeping

Synthese 191 (3):607-625 (2014)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Epistemic contextualists think that the truth-conditions of ‘knowledge’ ascriptions depend in part on the context in which they are uttered. But what features of context play a role in determining truth-conditions? The idea that the making salient of error possibilities is a central part of the story has often been attributed to contextualists, and a number of contextualists seem to endorse it (see Cohen (Philos Perspect, 13:57–89, 1999) and Hawthorne, (Knowledge and lotteries, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2004)). In this paper I argue that the focus on salience relations is a mistake. On the view I defend, the relevant features of context are facts about what error-possibilities and alternatives those in the context have a reason to consider, not facts about what error-possibilities and alternatives those in the context actually consider. As I will argue, this view has certain advantages over the standard view
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2013-05-27
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Elusive Knowledge.Lewis, David K.

View all 34 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
What's the Point of Knowing How?Habgood‐Coote, Joshua

View all 15 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
330 ( #13,213 of 48,954 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
31 ( #22,656 of 48,954 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.