First-Order Logic and Some Existential Sentences

Disputatio 4 (31):255-270 (2011)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
‘Quantified pure existentials’ are sentences (e.g., ‘Some things do not exist’) which meet these conditions: (i) the verb EXIST is contained in, and is, apart from quantificational BE, the only full (as against auxiliary) verb in the sentence; (ii) no (other) logical predicate features in the sentence; (iii) no name or other sub-sentential referring expression features in the sentence; (iv) the sentence contains a quantifier that is not an occurrence of EXIST. Colin McGinn and Rod Girle have alleged that standard first-order logic cannot adequately deal with some such existentials. The article defends the view that it can.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2016-10-14
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
423 ( #19,064 of 72,563 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
25 ( #34,392 of 72,563 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.