Praise, blame, obligation, and DWE: Toward a framework for classical supererogation and kin

Journal of Applied Logic 9 (2):153-170 (2011)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Continuing prior work by the author, a simple classical system for personal obligation is integrated with a fairly rich system for aretaic (agent-evaluative) appraisal. I then explore various relationships between definable aretaic statuses such as praiseworthiness and blameworthiness and deontic statuses such as obligatoriness and impermissibility. I focus on partitions of the normative statuses generated ("normative positions" but without explicit representation of agency). In addition to being able to model and explore fundamental questions in ethical theory about the connection between blame, praise, permissibility and obligation, this allows me to carefully represent schemes for supererogation and kin. These controversial concepts have provided challenges to both ethical theory and deontic logic, and are among deontic logic's test cases.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
First archival date: 2014-04-28
Latest version: 2 (2014-04-28)
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
281 ( #24,496 of 65,555 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
19 ( #37,844 of 65,555 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.