Autonomous Chances and the Conflicts Problem

In Alastair Wilson (ed.), Asymmetries in Chance and Time. Oxford University Press. pp. 45-67 (2014)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In recent work, Callender and Cohen (2009) and Hoefer (2007) have proposed variants of the account of chance proposed by Lewis (1994). One of the ways in which these accounts diverge from Lewis’s is that they allow special sciences and the macroscopic realm to have chances that are autonomous from those of physics and the microscopic realm. A worry for these proposals is that autonomous chances may place incompatible constraints on rational belief. I examine this worry, and attempt to determine (i) what kinds of conflicts would be problematic, and (ii) whether these proposals lead to problematic conflicts. After working through a pair of cases, I conclude that these proposals do give rise to problematic conflicts.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MEAACA
Revision history
First archival date: 2013-05-13
Latest version: 3 (2014-06-03)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
A Better Best System Account of Lawhood.Cohen, Jonathan & Callender, Craig

View all 22 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
No Work For a Theory of Universals.Eddon, M. & Meacham, Christopher J. G.
No Crystal Balls.Spencer, Jack

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2013-05-13

Total views
382 ( #11,501 of 50,387 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
38 ( #15,956 of 50,387 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.