Autonomous Chances and the Conflicts Problem

In Alastair Wilson (ed.), Asymmetries in Chance and Time. Oxford University Press. pp. 45-67 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In recent work, Callender and Cohen (2009) and Hoefer (2007) have proposed variants of the account of chance proposed by Lewis (1994). One of the ways in which these accounts diverge from Lewis’s is that they allow special sciences and the macroscopic realm to have chances that are autonomous from those of physics and the microscopic realm. A worry for these proposals is that autonomous chances may place incompatible constraints on rational belief. I examine this worry, and attempt to determine (i) what kinds of conflicts would be problematic, and (ii) whether these proposals lead to problematic conflicts. After working through a pair of cases, I conclude that these proposals do give rise to problematic conflicts.

Author's Profile

Christopher J. G. Meacham
University of Massachusetts, Amherst

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-05-13

Downloads
670 (#20,395)

6 months
75 (#51,349)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?