Impermissive Bayesianism

Erkenntnis 79 (Suppl 6):1185-1217 (2013)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
This paper examines the debate between permissive and impermissive forms of Bayesianism. It briefly discusses some considerations that might be offered by both sides of the debate, and then replies to some new arguments in favor of impermissivism offered by Roger White. First, it argues that White’s defense of Indifference Principles is unsuccessful. Second, it contends that White’s arguments against permissive views do not succeed.
Reprint years
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
First archival date: 2013-05-13
Latest version: 2 (2013-10-13)
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
840 ( #7,261 of 69,143 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
52 ( #15,466 of 69,143 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.