Too Much of a Good Thing: Decision-Making in Cases with Infinitely Many Utility Contributions

Synthese:1-41 (forthcoming)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Theories that use expected utility maximization to evaluate acts have difficulty handling cases with infinitely many utility contributions. In this paper I present and motivate a way of modifying such theories to deal with these cases, employing what I call “direct difference taking”. This proposal has a number of desirable features: it’s natural and well-motivated, it satisfies natural dominance intuitions, and it yields plausible prescriptions in a wide range of cases. I then compare my account to the most plausible alternative, a proposal offered by Arntzenius (2014). I argue that while Arntzenius’s proposal has many attractive features, it runs into a number of problems which direct difference taking avoids.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MEATMO-8
Revision history
Archival date: 2019-12-13
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2019-12-13

Total views
97 ( #33,559 of 49,981 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
56 ( #10,368 of 49,981 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.