Who Decides How History Should Be Studied? [Book Review]

Chronicle of Higher Education 69 (2):1-1 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The claim that historians “write from a present-day perspective” does not entail that the past only matters when interpreted by categories of social justice. The past is a set of amorphous events and people, including their actions and motives. So, historians are free to explore various aspects of it to offer meaningful and compelling interpretations without necessarily privileging one category. The past is richer than we can humanely understand. Hence, it is important that new generations of scholars revise it from different angles and without ideological restrictions.

Author's Profile

Vicente Medina
Seton Hall University

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-08-31

Downloads
185 (#73,154)

6 months
59 (#75,697)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?