Hume, Causation and Two Arguments Concerning God

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion, Hume (1779/1993) appeals to his account of causation (among other things) to undermine certain arguments for the existence of God. If 'anything can cause anything', as Hume claims, then the Principle of Causal Adequacy is false; and if the Principle of Causal Adequacy is false, then any argument for God's existence that relies on that principle fails. Of course, Hume's critique has been influential. But Hume's account of causation undermines the argument from evil at least as much as it undermines arguments for theism, or so I argue. I then suggest that Hume's account of causation can be used to formulate an alternative argument against classical theism.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MEGHCA
Upload history
Archival date: 2018-03-14
View other versions
Added to PP index
2014-07-06

Total views
957 ( #5,432 of 65,759 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
132 ( #4,494 of 65,759 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.