A Method for Evaluation of Arguments from Analogy

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
It is a common view that arguments from analogy can only be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. However, while this reflects an important insight, I propose instead a relatively simple method for their evaluation based on just (i) their general form and (ii) four core questions. One clear advantage of this proposal is that it does not depend on any substantial (and controversial) view of similarity, unlike influential current alternative methods, such as Walton’s. Following some initial clarification of the notion of analogy and similarity, I demonstrate the strength of this method by analysing and evaluating three prominent arguments from analogy.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MEIAMF
Upload history
Archival date: 2016-05-07
View other versions
Added to PP index
2016-01-22

Total views
1,512 ( #2,350 of 2,432,439 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
292 ( #1,467 of 2,432,439 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.