Structuralism in Social Science: Obsolete or Promising?

Teorie Vědy / Theory of Science 40 (2):129-132 (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
The approach of structuralism came to philosophy from social science. It was also in social science where, in 1950–1970s, in the form of the French structuralism, the approach gained its widest recognition. Since then, however, the approach fell out of favour in social science. Recently, structuralism is gaining currency in the philosophy of mathematics. After ascertaining that the two structuralisms indeed share a common core, the question stands whether general structuralism could not find its way back into social science. The nature of the major objections raised against French structuralism – concerning its alleged ahistoricism, methodological holism and universalism – are reconsidered. While admittedly grounded as far as French structuralism is concerned, these objections do not affect general structuralism as such. The fate of French structuralism thus does not seem to preclude the return of general structuralism into social science, rather, it provides some hints where the difficulties may lie.
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2019-04-01
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
56 ( #50,791 of 2,433,230 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #51,054 of 2,433,230 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.