From ‘Intersex’ to ‘DSD’: a case of epistemic injustice

Synthese:1-19 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The 2005 International Consensus Conference on Intersex resulted in a substantive revision of the lexicon and guidelines for treating intersex conditions. The speed with which the new treatment protocol has been adopted by healthcare practitioners and providers is considered unprecedented. However, a number of intersex people and advocacy groups have complained that the recommended revisions are inadequately informed by the testimony of intersex people. In this paper, I argue that such complaints are valid and that, despite the conference conveners stated intention, the revisions perpetuate the epistemic injustice long endured by intersex people. By analyzing the Consensus Conference and its results as a failed attempt to redress the epistemic marginalization of intersex patients and advocacy groups, I am able to identify lingering institutional hurdles to cultivating the virtue of epistemic justice in biomedical practice.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MERFIT
Revision history
First archival date: 2019-07-20
Latest version: 3 (2019-07-23)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2017-02-14

Total views
101 ( #29,691 of 45,649 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
66 ( #10,850 of 45,649 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.