From ‘Intersex’ to ‘DSD’: a case of epistemic injustice

Synthese:1-19 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The 2005 International Consensus Conference on Intersex resulted in a substantive revision of the lexicon and guidelines for treating intersex conditions. The speed with which the new treatment protocol has been adopted by healthcare practitioners and providers is considered unprecedented. However, a number of intersex people and advocacy groups have complained that the recommended revisions are inadequately informed by the testimony of intersex people. In this paper, I argue that such complaints are valid and that, despite the conference conveners stated intention, the revisions perpetuate the epistemic injustice long endured by intersex people. By analyzing the Consensus Conference and its results as a failed attempt to redress the epistemic marginalization of intersex patients and advocacy groups, I am able to identify lingering institutional hurdles to cultivating the virtue of epistemic justice in biomedical practice.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MERFIT
Upload history
First archival date: 2019-07-20
Latest version: 3 (2019-07-23)
View other versions
Added to PP index
2017-02-14

Total views
245 ( #19,809 of 53,604 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
60 ( #9,995 of 53,604 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.