Ancillary Care Obligations in Light of an African Bioethic: From Entrustment to Communion

Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 38 (2):111–126 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Henry Richardson has recently published the first book ever devoted to ancillary care obligations, which roughly concern what medical researchers are morally required to provide to participants beyond what safety requires. In it Richardson notes that he has presented the ‘only fully elaborated view out there’ on this topic, which he calls the ‘partial-entrustment model’. In this article, I provide a new theory of ancillary care obligations, one that is grounded on ideals of communion salient in the African philosophical tradition and is intended to rival and surpass Richardson’s model, which is a function of Western considerations of autonomy. I argue that the relational approach of the former has several virtues in comparison to the basic individualism of the latter.

Author's Profile

Thaddeus Metz
Cornell University (PhD)

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-03-03

Downloads
542 (#28,744)

6 months
111 (#31,880)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?