Correct Conceivability and its Role in the Epistemology of Modality

Les Principes Métaphysiques (2020)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
The starting point of this paper is an argument to the conclusion that the definition of metaphysical possibility in terms of correct conceivability, conceivability informed by knowledge of relevant essences, found in Rosen (2006) is equivalent to a version of the essentialist definition of metaphysical necessity. This argument appears to show that correct conceivability is a notion of conceivability by name only and is therefore of no interest to epistemologists of modality. In this paper, I present the equivalence argument, explain the idealizing assumptions involved in it and sketch a version of the conceivability approach which weakens these assumptions in order to show that the notion of correct conceivability can still play a specific limited role in the epistemology of modality.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2020-03-20
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Naming and Necessity.Kripke, Saul A.

View all 53 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
74 ( #37,525 of 50,239 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
74 ( #7,138 of 50,239 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.