Is external memory memory? Biological memory and extended mind

Consciousness and Cognition 21 (3):1154-1165 (2012)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Clark and Chalmers claim that an external resource satisfying the following criteria counts as a memory: the agent has constant access to the resource; the information in the resource is directly available; retrieved information is automatically endorsed; information is stored as a consequence of past endorsement. Research on forgetting and metamemory shows that most of these criteria are not satisfied by biological memory, so they are inadequate. More psychologically realistic criteria generate a similar classification of standard putative external memories, but the criteria still do not capture the function of memory. An adequate account of memory function, compatible with its evolution and its roles in prospection and imagination, suggests that external memory performs a function not performed by biological memory systems. External memory is thus not memory. This has implications for: extended mind theorizing, ecological validity of memory research, the causal theory of memory
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MICIEM
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-05-21
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
The Extended Mind.Clark, Andy & Chalmers, David J.
Self-Projection and the Brain.Buckner, Randy L. & Carroll, Daniel C.

View all 42 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 19 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index
2013-09-15

Total views
278 ( #11,259 of 40,688 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
57 ( #9,766 of 40,688 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.