Is external memory memory? Biological memory and extended mind

Consciousness and Cognition 21 (3):1154-1165 (2012)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Clark and Chalmers claim that an external resource satisfying the following criteria counts as a memory: the agent has constant access to the resource; the information in the resource is directly available; retrieved information is automatically endorsed; information is stored as a consequence of past endorsement. Research on forgetting and metamemory shows that most of these criteria are not satisfied by biological memory, so they are inadequate. More psychologically realistic criteria generate a similar classification of standard putative external memories, but the criteria still do not capture the function of memory. An adequate account of memory function, compatible with its evolution and its roles in prospection and imagination, suggests that external memory performs a function not performed by biological memory systems. External memory is thus not memory. This has implications for: extended mind theorizing, ecological validity of memory research, the causal theory of memory
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MICIEM
Upload history
Archival date: 2015-05-21
View other versions
Added to PP index
2013-09-15

Total views
417 ( #11,074 of 52,893 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
49 ( #12,362 of 52,893 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.